AEZAKMI Browser: Features, Pricing and Support

What Is the AEZAKMI Browser and Who Uses It?

The AEZAKMI browser is a Chromium-based multi-profile browser launched around 2019 for Russian-speaking affiliate and media-buying teams. It gives each account its own profile, with separate cookies, storage, cache, fingerprint settings and proxy. It ships no proxies of its own, and reported entry pricing has swung from $69/mo for 100 profiles in a 2024 review to roughly $15/mo in 2026 sources.

How the AEZAKMI Browser Separates Profiles Under the Hood

AEZAKMI is built on Chromium and works like most profile managers: every profile is a self-contained browser identity stored in its own data directory. When you sign into an account in one profile, that session stays there. A second profile opened at the same time does not inherit those cookies, so you can work across accounts side by side without logging out and back in.

The isolation goes deeper than tabs. Each profile carries its own browser storage, cache and fingerprint values, and you bind a proxy per profile rather than per browser. That structure is what makes the tool workable for agency jobs — one profile per client, per storefront, or per test persona.

What Each Profile Actually Stores

• Cookies and authenticated sessions for every site you log into
• Local storage, IndexedDB and service worker data
• Cache, history and download records
• Saved logins, autofill entries and permission grants
• The proxy binding and its credentials
• Fingerprint values and window size for that profile only

Because storage sits per profile, deleting a profile removes that environment completely — useful when a client offboards and you want nothing left on the machine.

Fingerprint Settings You Can Edit

The settings panel is unusually detailed for this price bracket. You can adjust User-Agent and Client Hints, the reported operating system, screen resolution, hardware concurrency, device memory, WebRTC behaviour, WebGL vendor and renderer, timezone, geolocation, the language list, Canvas and AudioContext values, and the font list. Values are generated to stay internally consistent within a profile instead of shifting between visits — which matters, because a fingerprint that changes on every page load is worse than a boring, stable one.

Small signals count as much as the big switches. Even the way a site requests an icon file contributes to a fingerprint, so it is worth understanding how browser fingerprinting via favicon requests work before you start editing values by hand. AEZAKMI also ships a cookie bot that simulates browsing to warm a profile, plus cookie import and bulk identity management.

Proxy Assignment

AEZAKMI accepts HTTP, HTTPS and SOCKS5 proxies, assignable at creation and changeable later without rebuilding the profile. That flexibility helps when a provider goes down and you need to swap an endpoint in minutes. What it does not do is supply proxies: there is no bundled residential pool, so you buy bandwidth from a provider and manage that cost yourself.

Why the Chromium Core and Release Cadence Matter

AEZAKMI runs on a Chromium 99 core, a version released in 2022. By March 2025 the client was still shipping version 1.9.7.1 — the same build shown in a two-year-old video — and the vendor blog had not been updated since 2021. Reviewers still describe an active product in 2026, but the version trail tells its own story.

That gap shows up in three practical ways. Security first: Chromium releases carry patches for known vulnerabilities, and a core that old has missed several years of them. Compatibility second: sites ship new JavaScript APIs and feature-detection checks constantly, so an older engine renders some modern interfaces differently or fails outright. Consistency third: if the browser reports a modern User-Agent while running a 2022 engine, behaviour gives it away — missing APIs where the version string says they should exist.

You can check this yourself in a minute. Open the version information inside the app, note the Chromium build number, and compare it with the current stable Chrome release. If the core has moved forward since the 2025 reports, the picture improves. If it has not, you are choosing an older engine knowingly and should treat it that way.

AEZAKMI Pricing: What the Reported Numbers Actually Say

This is the part with the least agreement between sources. A 2024 review quoted $69/month for 100 profiles with a 24-hour trial. May 2026 reviews report tiers starting near $15/month for the same 100 profiles — roughly a four-fold difference. Only the vendor’s own page settles it, so treat the table below as a starting point for your own check.

Annual billing is reported at roughly 20% off, the usual pattern in this market. Free access is messier still: a May 2026 review describes a 10-profile tier with no time limit, a June 2026 directory entry states there is no permanent free tier and describes premium pricing for committed professional users, and the 2024 review mentioned a 24-hour trial. Three sources, three answers — so do not plan a workflow around free access. Test whatever the site offers on the day you visit, and assume paid entry if your timeline is short.

Then add the line item marketing pages rarely quote: proxies. There is no built-in pool here, so total cost is the plan plus bandwidth bought separately, and usage-based billing is far less predictable than a seat price. If you have not compared the two common ways of routing traffic, this residential proxy vs VPN breakdown covers where each one fits. For reference, Send.win includes 5 GB/month of residential bandwidth on Pro and 20 GB/month on Team, with extra gigabytes at $6/GB.

Who the AEZAKMI Browser Suits — and Who Should Look Elsewhere

The product’s centre of gravity is clear. Its marketing and community target affiliate and traffic-arbitrage specialists, Facebook advertising teams, e-commerce sellers running multiple storefronts, and airdrop participants, largely in Russian-speaking markets. If that is your world, the interface and support channels will feel familiar from day one.

Team features are the second draw: reported seat counts of 2, 5 and 10 across the three tiers, plus profile sharing and access controls. That is enough structure for a small agency splitting client accounts between buyers and assistants.

Where it gets weaker:

• macOS stability. A 2026 review describes Mac support as less stable than Windows, so test your exact workflow on a Mac before committing.
• Public proof. There are effectively no user reviews on major software directories — one directory page still shows “No reviews yet” — and no testimonials on the homepage, so you cannot judge how the tool held up for other buyers over two years.
• Dashboard scale. Reviewers report the dashboard lists profiles with name, resolution, agent and proxy but has no sorting or filtering, which gets awkward past about ten profiles. There is also no stop button for a running profile.
• Launcher quirks. Installing the app reportedly creates several desktop icons, and the browser opens as a plain Chromium window launched from an icon, one profile per icon, so profiles cannot be started from the dashboard.

One constraint applies to every tool in this category. Profile isolation is only legitimate for accounts you own or are authorised to manage, and each platform’s own rules still apply. Where a platform restricts multiple accounts, use its official route — Amazon’s approval process for an additional seller account, or Business Manager roles for agencies handling client assets on Meta. No browser changes those terms.

A Pre-Purchase Checklist for the AEZAKMI Browser

Work through this in order and you will spend an afternoon on the decision rather than a quarter.

1. Capture the current price from the official site on the day you evaluate, because third-party figures disagree.
2. Confirm the Chromium build inside the app and compare it with the current stable Chrome release.
3. Check current free access and treat it as a test environment, not production.
4. Run a real task, not a login. Open the ad manager or dashboard your team uses daily and click through three screens.
5. Assign a proxy and verify the exit IP, then check that timezone, language and region line up with it.
6. Test your most important platform first — if Meta or a specific marketplace is the core use case, start there.
7. Push the dashboard past ten profiles and see how retrieval and launching behave once sorting matters.
8. Email support a real question and time the reply. With no public reviews, this is your only reliability signal.

Common Mistakes in AEZAKMI Setups

Most problems people hit with multi-profile browsers are configuration mistakes rather than product failures. The recurring ones:

• Reusing one profile across clients. Sharing a profile between two accounts defeats the isolation you paid for; give each client their own.
• Randomising fingerprint values again and again. A new identity every session looks stranger than one stable, boring setup.
• Ignoring the proxy’s geography. A profile set to one country with an exit IP in another produces mismatched currency, language and region data.
• Importing cookie files from unknown sources. That loads a stranger’s session history into your environment.
• Treating DevTools hooks as a finished automation platform. Automation through Chrome DevTools Protocol is reported as possible, but the documentation is thin, so budget engineering time — and check each platform’s rules on automated access first.
• Underbuying bandwidth. Proxy GB runs out mid-project far more often than profile slots do, so these tips on how to compare residential proxy prices keep the second invoice predictable.

AEZAKMI vs Other Browser Profile Managers

Entry pricing in this category runs from under $10/month to $99/month for a hundred profiles, so price alone rarely decides it. What separates the tools is the engine version, whether proxies are included, and how team features behave under daily load.

Read vendor-authored comparisons with care in both directions: several of the most detailed AEZAKMI reviews were written by competing browser vendors, which shapes what they emphasise. The same caution applies to this page, so test the parts that matter to you.

If your work is QA, visual testing or influencer management, a browser you can open from any device without installing anything may matter more than a deep fingerprint panel — this cloud browser alternative comparison sets out those trade-offs.

Where Send.win Fits

Send.win is a browser profile manager built for the same core job: one isolated profile per client, brand, storefront or test persona, each with its own cookies, storage, sessions and fingerprint settings. The differences are where those profiles run and what comes bundled with them.

How Send.win Helps With Aezakmi Browser

Send.win is a browser profile manager for professionals and teams: every account gets its own isolated browser profile.

• Isolated profiles – separate cookies, storage and sessions per profile
• Fingerprint protection – each profile keeps its own consistent browser fingerprint, so profiles never share one browser identity
• Desktop app + cloud browser – native app for Windows, macOS and Linux, or run profiles in the cloud with no install
• Residential proxies included – on Pro and Team, with timezone and locale matched to the proxy
• Team sharing – share a signed-in profile with a teammate without sharing the password

Try the free cloud demo — no install — or download the desktop app. Paid plans start at $19/month, and your first card purchase is covered by a 7-day money-back guarantee (see pricing).

Sendwin Browser is a native desktop app for Windows 10/11, macOS 12+ and Linux, built on a patched Chromium engine, so the ageing-core problem described above does not apply. The cloud browser runs profiles on Send.win’s servers in Helsinki, Finland, from any device with nothing to install — useful when a contractor needs one client profile without your internal setup. The free cloud demo needs no signup for a three-minute preview, and a free account gets 10 minutes a day.

Residential proxies are included on Pro and Team with metered bandwidth, or you can bring your own HTTP/SOCKS5 endpoint, and timezone, locale, WebRTC and geolocation follow the proxy’s exit IP automatically. Share a profile with a paid teammate and it opens already signed in, so no password changes hands, and cloud sync keeps logins available across your devices. Plans start at $19/mo for Pro with 150 saved profiles, 5 GB/month of proxy bandwidth and 6 seats, and $49/mo for Team with 500 profiles, 20 GB/month and 16 seats; every plan runs up to 50 profiles at once, and your first card purchase is covered by a 7-day money-back guarantee.

Be equally clear about what Send.win does not do. There is no API, SDK or headless mode on any plan, and no way to control profiles from code — every profile is opened and used by a person, in the desktop app or in the cloud browser. Teams that need browsers driven by software should choose a platform built for exactly that, and check the target platform’s terms before they do.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the AEZAKMI browser used for?

It runs multiple separate browser profiles on one machine, each with its own cookies, storage and fingerprint settings. Reported audiences are affiliate and media-buying teams, Facebook advertisers, e-commerce sellers with several storefronts and airdrop participants, largely in Russian-speaking markets. Use it only with accounts you own or are authorised to manage.

Is the AEZAKMI browser free, or is there a trial?

Sources disagree. A May 2026 review describes a free tier of 10 profiles with no time limit, a June 2026 directory entry says there is no permanent free tier, and a 2024 review mentioned a 24-hour trial. Check the official site on the day you evaluate, and do not build a client workflow around free access.

How much does the AEZAKMI browser cost in 2026?

May 2026 reviews report Team 100 at about $15/month for 100 profiles and 2 seats, Team 300 at about $30/month with 5 seats, and Team 1000 at about $75/month with 10 seats, with annual billing around 20% off. A 2024 review quoted $69/month for 100 profiles, so verify the current figure before buying.

Does the AEZAKMI browser include proxies?

No. It supports HTTP, HTTPS and SOCKS5 proxies per profile and lets you change an endpoint without recreating the profile, but there is no built-in pool. Budget bandwidth separately, because residential GB usage, not profile count, is usually what pushes the monthly total up.

Is the AEZAKMI browser safe to buy?

There is no evidence of anything improper, but reliability signals are thin: no user reviews on major directories, no homepage testimonials, and several detailed reviews written by competing vendors. The 2022-era Chromium core is the more concrete concern, because it affects both security patching and how modern sites render.

Can I automate the AEZAKMI browser?

Reviews report that profiles can be driven through Chrome DevTools Protocol, but the documentation is described as thin, so expect engineering time before anything runs reliably. Check each platform’s terms on automated access before you build anything on it.

Does the AEZAKMI browser work well on macOS?

It supports Windows and macOS, but a 2026 review calls Mac support less stable than the Windows build. If your team is on Macs, run a full working day of real tasks on one machine before rolling it out across the team.

Which fingerprint parameters can you change in AEZAKMI?

The panel covers User-Agent and Client Hints, reported operating system, screen resolution, hardware concurrency, device memory, WebRTC, WebGL, timezone, geolocation, languages, Canvas, AudioContext and fonts. Values are generated to stay internally consistent within a profile, which is the behaviour that matters most.

Related Products & Resources

• Download
• Demo Browser
• Pricing
• Fingerprint Checker
• Canvas Fingerprint Test