Multilogin vs Octo Browser — Which Antidetect Browser Should You Pick?
Multilogin vs Octo Browser comes down to budget and scale. Multilogin is the legacy market leader with deep fingerprint customization and two proprietary browser kernels, but its pricing starts high and locks automation behind enterprise tiers. Octo Browser launched later with aggressive per-profile pricing, faster onboarding, and solid team tools at a fraction of the cost. Below we break down fingerprint quality, profile limits, team features, automation API, proxy management, and pricing — plus where Send.win undercuts both at $6.99/month.
Quick Verdict — Multilogin vs Octo Browser vs Send.win
| Feature | Multilogin | Octo Browser | Send.win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | ~€99/mo (Solo) | ~€29/mo (Starter) | $6.99/mo (annual Pro) |
| Profile Limit (Base Plan) | 100 profiles | ~50 profiles | 150 profiles |
| Browser Kernels | Mimic (Chromium) + Stealthfox (Firefox) | Chromium-based | Chromium-based |
| Automation API | Yes (higher tiers) | Yes (all paid plans) | Yes (Pro + Team) |
| Team Seats (Base) | 0 (Solo is single-user) | Varies by plan | 16 seats (Team) |
| Cloud Browser Sessions | Yes (Quick Profiles) | No | Yes |
| Free Trial | Limited demo | Free plan (limited) | 30-day trial, no credit card |
| Proxy Bandwidth Included | No (BYO proxy) | No (BYO proxy) | 5 GB (Pro) / 20 GB (Team) |
| Desktop App | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Linux |
Fingerprint Quality — Who Masks Better?
The core job of any antidetect browser is to make each profile look like a unique, real device to every website you visit. Both Multilogin and Octo Browser take different approaches to this problem.
Multilogin’s Fingerprint Engine
Multilogin pioneered the modern antidetect space and offers two proprietary browser kernels: Mimic (Chromium-based) and Stealthfox (Firefox-based). Having both kernels means you can mix browser types across profiles, which makes large fleets of accounts look more organic. Multilogin covers Canvas, WebGL, AudioContext, fonts, screen resolution, timezone, geolocation, WebRTC, and hardware concurrency. Each parameter can be manually tuned or auto-generated. The dual-kernel approach remains a genuine differentiator — if a platform specifically flags Chromium-based antidetects, you can fall back to Stealthfox.
Octo Browser’s Fingerprint Engine
Octo Browser runs a single Chromium-based kernel but covers the same browser fingerprint parameters: Canvas, WebGL, AudioContext, fonts, timezone, screen, WebRTC, and more. Octo’s approach leans toward automatic profile generation with smart defaults — less knob-turning, faster setup. For most affiliate marketing and social-media management use cases, Octo’s fingerprint coverage is sufficient. Where it falls short compared to Multilogin is the absence of a Firefox kernel and fewer granular override options for advanced users who want per-parameter control.
Fingerprint Verdict
Multilogin wins on depth and flexibility. Octo Browser wins on speed and simplicity. For 90% of multi-account workflows, both pass the same detection checks. The dual-kernel advantage only matters if you specifically need Firefox-profile diversity in your fleet.
Profile Limits and Scaling
How many browser profiles you can run simultaneously — and how many you can store — directly affects your operating costs per account.
Multilogin’s Solo plan starts at roughly €99/month for 100 stored profiles. Scaling to 300+ profiles pushes you into Team or Custom tiers that can exceed €200/month. Octo Browser’s entry-level Starter plan begins around €29/month for approximately 50 profiles, with scaling available in higher tiers. Both tools charge more as you add profiles, though Octo’s per-profile cost tends to stay lower than Multilogin’s at every tier.
Send.win starts at $9.99/month (or $6.99/month on annual billing) with 150 profiles included on the Pro plan and 500 profiles on the Team plan at $29.99/month ($20.99/month annually). If you’re running dozens of social media or e-commerce accounts, that price-per-profile ratio is hard to beat. Check our guide on managing multiple accounts for strategies that maximize every profile.
Team Features and Collaboration
Running a solo operation is one thing. Coordinating a team of VAs, media buyers, or account managers across shared profiles is where collaboration features matter.
Multilogin Teams
Multilogin offers profile sharing, role-based access, and activity logs on its Team and higher plans. You can assign profiles to specific team members, control who can edit fingerprint settings, and track who accessed which profile. The downside: team features are gated behind the more expensive tiers. The Solo plan is strictly single-user.
Octo Browser Teams
Octo Browser includes team management in its mid-tier plans. You can share profiles across team members with permission controls, transfer profiles between accounts, and manage access at a tag/group level. It is more accessible than Multilogin’s team tier from a pricing standpoint, but role granularity is somewhat more basic.
Send.win Teams
Send.win’s Team plan ($29.99/month, $20.99/month annual) includes 16 team seats, profile sharing, cloud sync, and cloud browser sessions. The cloud sessions mean team members can access profiles from any device without installing the Sendwin Browser desktop app — useful for distributed teams or contractors who need temporary access. For agencies that operate at scale, that combination of seats, cloud access, and 500 profiles creates a compelling package.
Automation API — Scripting at Scale
If your workflow involves automated account warming, scraping, or testing across dozens of profiles, the automation API is a critical differentiator.
Multilogin’s Selenium and Puppeteer integration works well, but it’s locked behind higher-priced plans. You connect to profile endpoints locally and script against them. The documentation is mature and there’s a community around it, but the entry cost to access automation is steep.
Octo Browser offers API access across all paid plans, supporting Selenium and Puppeteer. The API lets you create profiles, start/stop them, and connect via automation frameworks. For the price point, having API access on every paid tier is a clear advantage over Multilogin’s gated approach.
Send.win includes its Automation API starting on the Pro plan ($6.99/month annual) — supporting Selenium, Puppeteer, and Playwright. You connect scripts to the Sendwin Browser desktop app’s local automation endpoint and run headless or headed sessions. The fact that automation isn’t locked behind a team or enterprise paywall makes Send.win particularly attractive for solo developers and small teams automating session isolation workflows.
Proxy Management
Every antidetect browser is only as good as the proxies behind it. A perfect fingerprint with a datacenter IP still gets flagged.
Multilogin
Multilogin requires you to bring your own proxies (BYO). It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5, and you can assign different proxies per profile. There’s no built-in proxy bandwidth — you’ll need a separate residential proxy subscription, which typically adds $50-200+/month to your operating costs depending on traffic volume.
Octo Browser
Octo Browser also follows the BYO-proxy model. You configure proxies per profile with support for HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5. Some plans include proxy management features like bulk import and proxy health checks, but the bandwidth itself comes from your own provider. The total cost of ownership includes your Octo subscription plus proxy costs.
Send.win
Send.win bundles proxy bandwidth directly into its plans — 5 GB on Pro and 20 GB on Team — plus you can buy additional bandwidth at $6/GB. This bundled approach simplifies budgeting and eliminates the need for a separate proxy vendor for many users. For teams running proxy browsers across multiple geos, having bandwidth included reduces friction and total cost.
Pricing Breakdown
Price is where the comparison gets most interesting. Here’s a side-by-side view of what you actually pay month over month.
| Plan Tier | Multilogin | Octo Browser | Send.win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry / Solo | ~€99/mo (100 profiles) | ~€29/mo (~50 profiles) | $9.99/mo / $6.99 annual (150 profiles) |
| Mid / Team | ~€199/mo (300 profiles) | ~€79/mo (~200 profiles) | $29.99/mo / $20.99 annual (500 profiles) |
| Automation API | Team+ only | All paid plans | Pro + Team |
| Proxy Bandwidth | Not included | Not included | 5 GB (Pro) / 20 GB (Team) |
| Free Trial | Limited demo | Free plan (limited) | 30-day, no credit card |
Factor in external proxy costs for Multilogin and Octo Browser (typically $50-150/month for residential proxies), and the real monthly spend gap widens further. Send.win’s bundled bandwidth absorbs a significant chunk of that expense.
Desktop App and Platform Support
Multilogin supports Windows, macOS, and Linux with its desktop client. Octo Browser currently supports Windows and macOS. Send.win’s Sendwin Browser desktop app runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux — matching Multilogin’s platform coverage. Additionally, Send.win offers cloud browser sessions that let you run profiles without installing anything locally, which neither Multilogin nor Octo Browser replicates in quite the same way at these price points.
Who Should Pick Multilogin?
Multilogin is the right choice if you need the dual-kernel (Chromium + Firefox) fingerprint diversity, have an enterprise budget, and require the most granular per-parameter fingerprint control available. It suits large agencies and ad networks with dedicated anti-fraud teams that need absolute customization depth and don’t mind paying premium prices for it. The mature ecosystem and documentation also make it a safer bet for complex enterprise deployments.
Who Should Pick Octo Browser?
Octo Browser fits teams and solo operators who want solid fingerprint coverage at a significantly lower price than Multilogin. If you don’t need Firefox profiles and your automation needs are straightforward, Octo’s faster onboarding, lower entry cost, and accessible API make it a practical choice. Affiliate marketers, social media managers, and mid-size e-commerce operations often find Octo Browser hits the right balance of features and affordability.
Who Should Pick Send.win?
Send.win is built for value-conscious professionals and teams who need generous profile limits, automation API access, and proxy bandwidth — without assembling three separate subscriptions. At $6.99/month (annual Pro), you get 150 profiles, Selenium/Puppeteer/Playwright automation, and 5 GB of proxy bandwidth included. The 30-day free trial requires no credit card, so there’s zero risk in testing it against your current stack. Teams that need cloud browser sessions for distributed access or contractor onboarding will find Send.win’s cloud mode especially compelling.
🏆 Send.win Verdict
Multilogin is the premium incumbent with unmatched fingerprint depth. Octo Browser delivers 80% of that quality at a fraction of the price. But if you’re comparing total cost of ownership — profiles, automation, and proxy bandwidth in one plan — Send.win offers the best value at $6.99/month. You get 150 profiles, full Automation API, 5 GB proxy bandwidth, and a 30-day free trial without a credit card. For most multi-account workflows, that’s everything you need in a single subscription.
Try Send.win free today — 150 profiles, automation API, and proxy bandwidth included from day one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Multilogin better than Octo Browser for fingerprint masking?
Multilogin offers deeper fingerprint customization and a unique dual-kernel setup (Chromium + Firefox). For most use cases, Octo Browser’s Chromium-based engine performs comparably on standard detection tests. Multilogin’s edge matters primarily when you need Firefox-profile diversity or per-parameter manual overrides.
Can I use Selenium or Puppeteer with Octo Browser?
Yes. Octo Browser supports Selenium and Puppeteer automation on all paid plans. You connect to local profile endpoints and script against them just like you would with Multilogin or Send.win.
Which is cheaper — Multilogin or Octo Browser?
Octo Browser is significantly cheaper. Its Starter plan begins around €29/month versus Multilogin’s ~€99/month Solo plan. However, Send.win undercuts both at $6.99/month (annual) with more profiles included and proxy bandwidth bundled in.
Do Multilogin and Octo Browser include proxy bandwidth?
No. Both require you to bring your own proxy provider, which typically adds $50-200/month in external costs. Send.win includes 5 GB (Pro) or 20 GB (Team) of proxy bandwidth in its plans.
Does Send.win have a free trial?
Yes. Send.win offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required. You can test the full Pro feature set — including the Automation API and proxy bandwidth — before committing.
Can I run profiles in the cloud without installing anything?
Send.win offers cloud browser sessions that let you run profiles without installing the desktop app. This is useful for distributed teams or when you need quick access from a different machine. Multilogin has Quick Profiles for lightweight cloud use, while Octo Browser currently requires its desktop client.
Which antidetect browser is best for a team of 10+ people?
Send.win’s Team plan includes 16 seats, 500 profiles, and 20 GB of proxy bandwidth at $29.99/month ($20.99/month annual). Multilogin’s team tier costs significantly more, and Octo Browser’s team features sit in mid-tier pricing. For cost-per-seat, Send.win is the most affordable option for larger teams.
How do I migrate profiles from Multilogin or Octo Browser to Send.win?
You can recreate your profiles in Send.win with matching proxy and fingerprint settings. While there’s no one-click import between platforms, setting up 150 profiles in Send.win typically takes less time than expected thanks to bulk profile creation and preset templates. The 30-day trial gives you overlap time to test before fully switching.
How Send.win Helps With Multilogin Vs Octo Browser
Send.win is an antidetect browser built for exactly this kind of work — every profile is a clean, isolated identity:
- Isolated profiles – unique fingerprint, separate cookies and storage per profile
- Stealth engine – canvas, WebGL, fonts, and audio spoofed at the engine level
- Desktop app + cloud sessions – native app for Windows, macOS, and Linux, or run profiles in the cloud with no install
- Built-in residential proxies – with automatic timezone, locale, and WebRTC matching
- Team features – share logged-in profiles with teammates without sharing passwords
Try the instant cloud browser demo — no install, no signup — or download the desktop app. The 30-day free trial needs no credit card, and paid plans start at $6.99/month billed annually (see pricing).