Sendwin Vs Multilogin: Complete Comparison & Alternatives (2026)

Table of Contents

Send.win vs Multilogin: Overview

Choosing between Send.win and Multilogin depends on your specific needs — budget,
team size, technical requirements, and use case. Both are antidetect browser platforms designed for managing
multiple accounts with isolated profiles, but they take fundamentally different approaches to delivering that
isolation.

This comparison breaks down every major feature, pricing tier, and use case so you can make an informed decision.

Quick Comparison

Feature	Send.win	Multilogin
Architecture	100% cloud browser	Desktop app + cloud
Installation required	❌ No — browser-based	✅ Yes — desktop app
Operating systems	Any (web-based)	Windows, macOS, Linux
Free tier	✅ Yes	❌ No (trial only)
Starting price	Free / paid plans	€99/month
Browser engine	Real Chrome (cloud)	Mimic (Chromium) / Stealthfox (Firefox)
Session sharing	✅ One-click sharing	✅ Team collaboration
Proxy support	✅ Built-in per profile	✅ Per profile
API access	Coming soon	✅ Full automation API
Fingerprint management	Automatic	Manual + automatic

Architecture: Cloud vs. Desktop

Send.win: Cloud-First Approach

Send.win runs entirely in the cloud. Every browser profile exists on Send.win’s servers, and you access them through
your web browser:

No software to install — works on any device with a browser
No local resources consumed — profiles run on cloud infrastructure
Access from anywhere — start on your laptop, continue on your phone
Always up to date — no manual browser engine updates
Chromebook and tablet compatible — no Windows/macOS requirement

How Send.win Helps You Master Sendwin Vs Multilogin

Send.win makes Sendwin Vs Multilogin simple and secure with powerful browser isolation technology:

Browser Isolation – Every tab runs in a sandboxed environment
Cloud Sync – Access your sessions from any device
Multi-Account Management – Manage unlimited accounts safely
No Installation Required – Works instantly in your browser
Affordable Pricing – Enterprise features without enterprise costs

Try Send.win Free – No Credit Card Required

Experience the power of browser isolation with our free demo:

Instant Access – Start testing in seconds
Full Features – Try all capabilities
Secure – Bank-level encryption
Cross-Platform – Works on desktop, mobile, tablet
14-Day Money-Back Guarantee

Try Send.win Free Demo Now

Ready to upgrade? View pricing plans starting at just $9/month.

Multilogin: Desktop Application

Multilogin requires downloading and installing a desktop application:

Profiles run locally — uses your computer’s CPU and RAM
More control — granular fingerprint customization options
Browser engines: Mimic (Chromium-based) and Stealthfox (Firefox-based)
Cloud sync available — profiles can sync between devices (paid feature)
Requires Windows, macOS, or Linux

Architecture Impact on Performance

Metric	Send.win (Cloud)	Multilogin (Local)
Local CPU usage	Minimal (browser tab only)	High (each profile = Chrome instance)
Local RAM usage	~100MB per tab	~500MB-1GB per profile
Max concurrent profiles	Limited by plan, not hardware	Limited by your PC’s RAM
Network dependency	Requires stable internet	Works offline (limited)
Profile launch time	~3-5 seconds	~5-10 seconds

Fingerprinting Comparison

Send.win Fingerprinting

Automatic fingerprint generation — each profile gets a unique, consistent fingerprint
Real Chrome engine — no custom browser that might itself be detected
Hardware-level isolation — different GPU, screen, and CPU values per profile
No configuration needed — fingerprints are generated to match realistic device profiles

Multilogin Fingerprinting

Granular manual control — customize every fingerprint parameter individually
Two browser engines: Choose between Chromium (Mimic) or Firefox (Stealthfox)
Fingerprint templates — pre-built device profiles for common configurations
Canvas, WebGL, Audio fingerprint spoofing — noise injection for each parameter

Fingerprint Detection Test Results

Test	Send.win	Multilogin
Bot Sannysoft	✅ Pass	✅ Pass
CreepJS	✅ Pass	✅ Pass (some lies detected)
Pixelscan	✅ Consistent	✅ Consistent (with proper config)
BrowserLeaks	✅ Unique per profile	✅ Unique per profile
Cloudflare challenge	✅ Pass	✅ Pass

Both platforms pass standard detection tests. Send.win’s advantage is that it uses real Chrome instances rather than
a custom browser engine, which eliminates the risk of the browser itself being fingerprinted as an antidetect tool.
Multilogin’s advantage is granular control for users who need to match specific device configurations.

Pricing Comparison

Plan	Send.win	Multilogin
Free tier	✅ Available (limited profiles)	❌ No free tier
Entry level	Affordable	€99/month (Solo)
Team plan	Scales with usage	€199/month (Team, 3 seats)
Enterprise	Custom	€399/month (Scale, 7 seats)
Annual discount	Available	~25% discount

The pricing difference is significant, especially for individuals and small teams. Send.win’s free tier lets you try
the platform before committing, while Multilogin requires a €99/month minimum commitment.

Team Collaboration

Send.win Team Features

One-click session sharing: Share logged-in sessions without sharing passwords
Profile access control: Assign specific profiles to specific team members
No software installation: New team members start immediately via web browser
Cross-device access: Team members can work from any device

Multilogin Team Features

Profile sharing: Share browser profiles between team members
Role-based permissions: Admin, manager, and member roles
Cloud profile sync: Profiles stored centrally and synced to team devices
Requires installation: Each team member must install the desktop app

Use Case Recommendations

Choose Send.win If You:

Want to start free and scale as needed
Need to access profiles from multiple devices and locations
Don’t want to install desktop software
Need easy session sharing with team members
Work on Chromebooks, tablets, or shared computers
Want automatic fingerprint management without manual configuration
Manage multiple virtual browser profiles for multi-account operations

Choose Multilogin If You:

Need granular fingerprint customization
Require Selenium/Playwright API integration for automation
Want to choose between Chromium and Firefox engines
Need offline profile access
Have a budget of €99+/month
Run automation workflows that need direct browser API access

Platform-Specific Performance

Platform	Send.win	Multilogin
Facebook/Meta	✅ Excellent	✅ Excellent
Google (Ads, Search)	✅ Excellent	✅ Excellent
TikTok Ads	✅ Very Good	✅ Very Good
Amazon	✅ Very Good	✅ Excellent
eBay	✅ Very Good	✅ Very Good
LinkedIn	✅ Very Good	✅ Very Good
Crypto/Web3	✅ Good	✅ Very Good (MetaMask support)

Migration Guide: Multilogin to Send.win

If you’re considering switching from Multilogin to Send.win:

Export your Multilogin profile list — note which accounts are in each profile
Create corresponding Send.win profiles — one per account
Log into each platform in the new Send.win profile
Verify fingerprint consistency — check that detection tests pass
Transfer proxy configurations — assign the same proxies to new profiles
Run both platforms in parallel for a transition period
Gradually migrate accounts — don’t move everything at once

Security Comparison

Security Feature	Send.win	Multilogin
Data at rest encryption	✅ Cloud-side	✅ Local + cloud
No local data storage	✅ Everything in cloud	❌ Profiles stored locally
2FA on account	✅	✅
Device stolen protection	✅ No data on device	⚠️ Local profiles accessible
Session persistence	✅ Cloud-stored	✅ Cloud-synced

Send.win’s cloud architecture means no sensitive profile data exists on your local device. If your laptop is stolen
or compromised, your browser profiles and account security remain intact on Send.win’s servers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Send.win and Multilogin together?

Yes. Some users run high-value accounts on Multilogin (for granular control) and lower-risk accounts on Send.win (for
cost efficiency). There’s no conflict between the platforms.

Is Send.win as undetectable as Multilogin?

Both platforms pass standard bot detection tests. Send.win’s cloud browser approach uses real Chrome instances, which
may actually be harder to detect than Multilogin’s custom Mimic engine. However, Multilogin offers more manual
fingerprint tuning options for advanced users.

Which is better for large teams?

Send.win is simpler for large teams due to no software installation — new team members get access through their
browser instantly. Multilogin scales well too but requires desktop app installation on every team member’s device.

Can I automate profiles on Send.win like Multilogin’s API?

Multilogin currently has a more mature automation API (Selenium, Playwright integration). Send.win is developing API
capabilities. If automation is your primary use case, Multilogin has the edge today.

What about mobile access?

Send.win works on mobile browsers — you can access your profiles from a phone or tablet. Multilogin is desktop-only
and requires a Windows, macOS, or Linux computer.

Conclusion

Send.win vs Multilogin comes down to priorities. Send.win wins on accessibility (cloud-based, no
install, free tier, cross-device), pricing (significantly cheaper), and team simplicity (one-click session sharing).
Multilogin wins on granular control (manual fingerprint tuning), automation (Selenium/Playwright API), and engine
choice (Chromium + Firefox).

For most users — agencies, social media managers, e-commerce sellers, and multi-account operators —
Send.win provides the best value with the easiest workflow. For power users who need deep
fingerprint customization and browser automation APIs, Multilogin remains a strong choice despite
its premium pricing.