
Send.win vs Browserling: Overview
If you’re comparing Send.win vs Browserling, you’re likely looking for a cloud browser that meets a
specific need — whether that’s cross-browser testing, session isolation, multi-account management, or team
collaboration. Both tools let you run a browser in the cloud, but they serve very different audiences with different
feature sets.
This in-depth comparison covers architecture, features, pricing, and the use cases where each platform excels — so
you can make an informed choice.
What Is Browserling?
Browserling is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool launched in 2011. Its primary purpose is to let developers
test websites in different browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, IE, Edge, Safari) without needing those browsers
installed locally. You visit the Browserling site, pick a browser and OS combination, enter a URL, and get a live
interactive session.
Browserling Key Facts
- Founded: 2011
- Primary use: Cross-browser compatibility testing
- Architecture: Browser streamed from a remote server
- Session persistence: Ephemeral — sessions don’t persist
- Free tier: Yes — 3-minute sessions in Chrome
- Pricing: Starts at $19/month (individual plan)
How Send.win Helps You Master Sendwin Vs Browserling
Send.win makes Sendwin Vs Browserling simple and secure with powerful browser isolation technology:
- Browser Isolation – Every tab runs in a sandboxed environment
- Cloud Sync – Access your sessions from any device
- Multi-Account Management – Manage unlimited accounts safely
- No Installation Required – Works instantly in your browser
- Affordable Pricing – Enterprise features without enterprise costs
Try Send.win Free – No Credit Card Required
Experience the power of browser isolation with our free demo:
- Instant Access – Start testing in seconds
- Full Features – Try all capabilities
- Secure – Bank-level encryption
- Cross-Platform – Works on desktop, mobile, tablet
- 14-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Ready to upgrade? View pricing plans starting at just $9/month.
What Is Send.win?
Send.win is a cloud browser platform built for multi-account management, session isolation, and team collaboration.
Each user gets isolated browser profiles — unique fingerprint, separate cookies and storage, configurable proxy —
that persist between sessions. The focus is not on testing different browsers, but on running isolated, persistent
browser environments for business workflows.
Send.win Key Facts
- Primary use: Multi-account management, session isolation, team browser sharing
- Architecture: Persistent cloud browser profiles
- Session persistence: Yes — sessions saved between logins
- Free tier: Yes
- Unique fingerprint per profile: Yes
- Team sharing: Yes — share logged-in sessions without sharing passwords
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Send.win | Browserling |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Multi-account, session isolation, team sharing | Cross-browser compatibility testing |
| Session persistence | ✅ Persistent — cookies, logins saved | ❌ Ephemeral — resets each session |
| Unique per-profile fingerprint | ✅ Yes — each profile isolated | ❌ No — same fingerprint for all sessions |
| Multiple profiles | ✅ Yes — unlimited profiles | ❌ No profile management |
| Team session sharing | ✅ One-click, no password sharing | ❌ Not available |
| Proxy support per profile | ✅ Yes — configure per profile | ❌ No custom proxy support |
| Browser choice | Chrome-based | Chrome, Firefox, Opera, IE, Edge, Safari |
| OS combinations | Managed cloud environment | Windows, Linux, macOS |
| Cross-browser testing | ⚠️ Not primary use case | ✅ Core feature |
| API access | Coming soon | ✅ REST API for testing |
| Screenshot capture | Browser built-in | ✅ Built-in screenshot tool |
| Free tier | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes (3-min sessions) |
| Starting price | Free tier + paid plans | $19/month |
Browserling: Where It Excels
Cross-Browser Testing
Browserling’s primary strength is its browser matrix. If you need to verify how a website looks in Internet Explorer
11, Safari 15, or Firefox 78, Browserling delivers live interactive sessions in those specific browser/OS
combinations — something most developers can’t easily replicate locally.
One-Off Testing Sessions
For quick, no-setup testing — “does this CSS work in Firefox on Windows?” — Browserling is fast. No account required
for the free tier, just enter the URL and a browser session starts within seconds.
Developer Workflow Integration
Browserling offers an API that integrates with testing frameworks, CI/CD pipelines, and issue trackers. Screenshot
capture and session recording help document browser-specific bugs.
When to Choose Browserling
- You’re a developer testing website compatibility across browsers/OS
- You need a quick, ephemeral browser session with no setup
- Cross-browser QA is your primary workflow
- You need specific browser versions (older Firefox, Internet Explorer)
Send.win: Where It Excels
Persistent Multi-Account Management
Send.win’s sessions persist. Log into your client’s Facebook account in profile A, and it’s still logged in next week
when you open profile A again. Browserling, by contrast, starts fresh each session — you’d have to log in every
single time.
Complete Session Isolation
Each Send.win profile has its own browser fingerprint, cookies, localStorage, and IP assignment. Multiple profiles
can be active simultaneously — each looks like a completely different device and user to websites. Managing multiple accounts safely requires this level of isolation.
Team Sharing Without Password Exposure
Share a pre-authenticated browser session with a team member in one click. They get access to the
logged-in account — without ever seeing the password. Revoke access just as easily. This is a core use case for
agencies managing client accounts.
When to Choose Send.win
- You manage multiple accounts on the same platform (social media, e-commerce, ad networks)
- You need persistent sessions — staying logged in between work sessions
- You’re sharing account access within a team without sharing credentials
- You need unique browser fingerprints per account to prevent linking
- You want a cloud browser accessible from any device
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Send.win | Browserling |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free tier available (limited profiles) | 3-minute sessions in Chrome |
| Individual | Paid plans — see site for current pricing | $19/month (Personal) |
| Team | Team plans with session sharing | $59/month (Freelancer, 5 browsers parallel) |
| Business | Enterprise options | $139/month (Startup), $249/month (Business) |
Use Case Decision Matrix
| Use Case | Better Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-browser CSS testing | Browserling | Multiple browser/OS combinations |
| Multiple social media accounts | Send.win | Persistent sessions, unique fingerprints |
| Team sharing ad accounts | Send.win | Session sharing without password sharing |
| Quick ephemeral browser session | Browserling | No setup, instant session |
| Affiliate multi-ad-account management | Send.win | Isolated fingerprints, persistent logins |
| IE/Safari compatibility testing | Browserling | Only option with real IE/Safari access |
| Accessing accounts from multiple devices | Send.win | Cloud profiles accessible anywhere |
| Web scraping research sessions | Send.win | Isolated, persistent, configurable proxy |
Can You Use Both?
Yes — they’re complementary, not competing, for many teams. A web development agency might use Browserling for QA
testing during development, and Send.win for managing client social media and ad accounts. The tools serve different
parts of the workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Browserling save your browsing sessions?
No. Browserling sessions are ephemeral — when you close the session, everything is erased. There’s no persistent
cookie storage, login state, or session history. This makes it ideal for testing but unsuitable for ongoing account
management.
Can I use Browserling for multi-account management?
Not effectively. Browserling doesn’t persist sessions, doesn’t support multiple isolated profiles, and doesn’t
provide unique browser fingerprints per session. For multi-account management, you need a platform like Send.win
that provides persistent, isolated profiles.
Does Send.win support cross-browser testing?
Send.win is focused on Chrome-based browser profiles rather than cross-browser compatibility testing. If your primary
need is verifying how a site renders in Firefox, Safari, or Internet Explorer, Browserling is the better fit.
Which is better for a social media agency?
Send.win. Agencies managing multiple client accounts need persistent logins (so you don’t re-authenticate every
session), unique fingerprints (so platforms don’t link client accounts), and team-shareable browser profiles (so multiple team members can access the same account). None
of these needs are met by Browserling.
Is Browserling’s free tier enough for regular use?
Browserling’s free tier offers 3-minute sessions in Chrome only, without the ability to test other browsers. For
occasional, quick checks it can suffice — for regular cross-browser testing workflow, you’d need a paid plan.
Conclusion
The Send.win vs Browserling comparison reveals two tools with fundamentally different purposes.
Browserling excels at cross-browser compatibility testing — giving developers instant access to obscure browser/OS
combinations without local installation. Send.win excels at persistent, isolated cloud browser sessions for
multi-account management and team collaboration.
Choose Browserling if you’re a developer testing browser compatibility. Choose Send.win if you’re
managing multiple accounts, sharing access with a team, or need persistent isolated browser sessions that remember
your logins from session to session.
Related Products & Resources
- Browserling Alternative Complete Comparison Alternatives 2026
- How I Manage 10 Social Media Accounts Without Losing My Mind Sendwin Changed Everything
- Reclaiming Your Inbox Mastering Multiple Emails With Sendwin
- How Marketers Advertisers Use Sendwin To Manage Multiple Ad Accounts Safely
- Eliminate Cross Contamination Run Facebook Instagram And Google Ads In Parallel With Sendwin
