Sendwin Vs Kasm: Complete Comparison & Alternatives (2026)

Send.win vs Kasm: Two Approaches to Cloud Browsers

Comparing Send.win vs Kasm reveals two fundamentally different architectures for running browsers in
the cloud. Both deliver isolated browser sessions accessible from any device, but they target different users,
require different levels of technical skill, and solve different problems. This comparison helps you choose the
right platform.

What Is Kasm Workspaces?

Kasm Workspaces is a self-hosted container streaming platform. It runs Docker containers — browsers, desktops, and
applications — on your own servers and streams them to users via WebRTC. The platform is designed for IT teams,
enterprises, and developers who want full control over their browser isolation infrastructure.

Kasm Key Facts

Architecture: Self-hosted on your own servers (Docker/Kubernetes)
Browser types: Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Tor and full desktop containers
Admin skills required: Linux, Docker, networking, SSL certificates
Community Edition: Free (limited to 5 concurrent sessions)
Enterprise Edition: $5/user/month
Session persistence: Configurable — ephemeral or persistent volumes

How Send.win Helps You Master Sendwin Vs Kasm

Send.win makes Sendwin Vs Kasm simple and secure with powerful browser isolation technology:

Browser Isolation – Every tab runs in a sandboxed environment
Cloud Sync – Access your sessions from any device
Multi-Account Management – Manage unlimited accounts safely
No Installation Required – Works instantly in your browser
Affordable Pricing – Enterprise features without enterprise costs

Try Send.win Free – No Credit Card Required

Experience the power of browser isolation with our free demo:

Instant Access – Start testing in seconds
Full Features – Try all capabilities
Secure – Bank-level encryption
Cross-Platform – Works on desktop, mobile, tablet
14-Day Money-Back Guarantee

Try Send.win Free Demo Now

Ready to upgrade? View pricing plans starting at just $9/month.

What Is Send.win?

Send.win is a fully managed cloud browser platform. There’s nothing to install or host — you sign up, create browser
profiles, and access them from any browser. Each profile has its own unique fingerprint, cookies, and proxy
configuration, with sessions persisting between uses.

Send.win Key Facts

Architecture: Fully managed cloud — no infrastructure required
Browser types: Chrome-based cloud profiles
Admin skills required: None
Free tier: Yes
Session persistence: Always persistent — logins saved
Fingerprint isolation: Unique per profile automatically

Feature Comparison

Feature	Send.win	Kasm Workspaces
Hosting	Fully managed cloud	Self-hosted (your servers)
Setup time	Minutes (sign up and go)	Hours-days (server setup, Docker, SSL)
Browser engine	Chrome-based	Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Tor, full desktops
Fingerprint isolation	✅ Unique per profile (automatic)	⚠️ Not primary feature (same container image)
Session persistence	✅ Always	⚠️ Configurable (requires persistent volumes)
Team session sharing	✅ One-click, no password sharing	⚠️ Via admin-managed user accounts
Proxy per profile	✅ Built-in per-profile proxy	⚠️ Manual configuration per container
Multi-account management	✅ Core feature	⚠️ Not designed for this
Full Linux desktop	❌ Browser only	✅ Ubuntu, Fedora, Alpine desktops
GPU support	Managed	✅ NVIDIA GPU passthrough
API access	Coming soon	✅ Full REST API + SDK
Infrastructure cost	Subscription only	Server costs + Kasm licence
Server maintenance	None	Full ops responsibility (updates, security, scaling)

Architecture Deep Dive

Kasm: Self-Hosted Container Streaming

Your Infrastructure:
  ├── Kasm Manager (control plane)
  ├── Kasm Agent (per server node)
  │   ├── Chrome Container (user session)
  │   ├── Firefox Container (user session)
  │   ├── Ubuntu Desktop Container
  │   └── Custom App Container
  ├── Database (PostgreSQL)
  ├── Reverse Proxy (Nginx/Traefik)
  └── SSL Certificates (Let's Encrypt)

User → HTTPS → Your Reverse Proxy → Kasm Manager → Assigns Container
                                                   → Stream via WebRTC

Send.win: Managed Cloud Profiles

Send.win Infrastructure (managed for you):
  ├── Profile Storage
  ├── Fingerprint Engine
  ├── Proxy Router
  └── Streaming Servers

User → HTTPS → Send.win → Select Profile → Isolated Session
                                          → Unique Fingerprint
                                          → Assigned Proxy
                                          → Session Persists

Use Case Recommendations

Use Case	Better Choice	Reason
Multi-account social media management	Send.win	Built-in fingerprint isolation and persistence
Enterprise browser isolation (security)	Kasm	Full control, compliance, air-gapped options
Team account sharing (agency)	Send.win	One-click session sharing
Developer workstations in cloud	Kasm	Full desktop environments (IDE, terminal)
Quick cloud browser access (non-technical)	Send.win	Zero setup, no server management
Security research / malware analysis	Kasm	Disposable containers, full OS access
E-commerce multi-store management	Send.win	Persistent logins, unique fingerprints
Education lab environments	Kasm	Full desktops for students, admin controls
Small team or individual user	Send.win	No infrastructure overhead
Large enterprise (1000+ users)	Kasm	Custom deployment, full control, compliance

Cost Comparison

Kasm Total Cost of Ownership

Kasm Costs:
  Community (Free tier):
    Server: ~$20-80/month (VPS/cloud instance)
    Max 5 concurrent sessions
    Total: ~$20-80/month

  Enterprise (5 users):
    Licence: $25/month ($5/user)
    Server: ~$40-100/month
    Total: ~$65-125/month

  Enterprise (50 users):
    Licence: $250/month
    Server(s): ~$200-500/month (multi-node)
    Total: ~$450-750/month

  Hidden costs:
    + Sysadmin time for maintenance
    + SSL certificate management
    + Security patching
    + Monitoring and alerting setup

Send.win Total Cost

Send.win Costs:
  Free tier: $0/month (limited profiles)
  Paid plans: Subscription-based
  
  Hidden costs: None
    ✓ Infrastructure managed
    ✓ Updates automatic
    ✓ No server maintenance
    ✓ No SSL management

When Kasm Makes Sense

You need full desktop environments — Kasm streams Ubuntu, Fedora, and custom Linux desktops,
not just browsers
Compliance requirements — data must stay on your own infrastructure (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2)
You have DevOps capability — a team that can manage Docker, Kubernetes, networking, and
security patching
Custom workloads — you need to run specific applications beyond browsers
Large scale — 100+ concurrent users where self-hosting is more cost-effective

When Send.win Makes Sense

You manage multiple accounts — this is Send.win’s core purpose, with per-profile fingerprint isolation
No infrastructure team — you want cloud browsers without server management
Team collaboration — share logged-in browser sessions without sharing passwords
Quick setup — need isolated browser profiles working within minutes, not days
Small to medium teams — subscription pricing is simpler than infrastructure budgeting

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Kasm for multi-account management?

Technically yes — you can create separate Kasm sessions for each account. However, Kasm doesn’t provide unique
browser fingerprints per session by default, doesn’t have per-profile proxy assignment, and session persistence
requires manual configuration with persistent volumes. For dedicated multi-account management, Send.win is purpose-built for this use case.

Is Kasm free?

Kasm Community Edition is free but limited to 5 concurrent sessions and lacks enterprise features (SSO, multi-server,
detailed logging). You still pay for server infrastructure. Enterprise Edition starts at $5/user/month.

Can Send.win run full Linux desktops?

No — Send.win focuses on browser-based profiles, not full desktop environments. If you need a full Linux desktop in
the cloud with terminal access, file managers, and desktop applications, Kasm is the right choice.

Which has better performance?

Kasm can be faster because you control the server location and specs — deploy a powerful server near your users for
low latency. Send.win’s performance depends on their infrastructure, which you don’t control but also don’t
maintain.

Can I migrate from Kasm to Send.win or vice versa?

These platforms don’t have direct migration paths since they serve different purposes. If switching from Kasm
(browser isolation) to Send.win (multi-account), you’d create new profiles and re-login to accounts. If moving from
Send.win to Kasm, you’d set up your own infrastructure and configure sessions manually.

Conclusion

The Send.win vs Kasm decision is fundamentally about managed simplicity versus self-hosted control.
Kasm gives you a powerful, flexible container streaming platform — browsers, desktops, and custom apps — but
requires infrastructure expertise. Send.win gives you purpose-built multi-account browser profiles with team
sharing, fingerprint isolation, and zero infrastructure — but only browsers, not full desktops.

For multi-account management and team browser sharing, choose Send.win. For enterprise browser
isolation, developer workstations, and full desktop environments with complete infrastructure control, choose
Kasm.